THINK TANK / Tools · V0.1

Nine-Dimension Comparison Worksheet for Capital Pathways

Compare a loan, a new equity subscription, and a combination of new equity and an existing-share transfer. Record your assessment, its evidence, and open questions, and check who receives funds, what rights investors obtain, and where returns come from.

Use this resourceTools
Purpose
Compare a loan, a new equity subscription, and a combination of new equity and an existing-share transfer. Record your assessment, its evidence, and open questions, and check who receives funds, what rights investors obtain, and where returns come from.
Conditions for use
Check that the subject, objective and constraints fit the task. Confirm any conditions that the article does not specify.
Tools
Fields, records and interpretation rules
Evidence and validation limits
Editable Excel tool V0.1. The workbook is in Chinese. The three proposed structures and amounts are fictional. Figures are in units of RMB 10,000. No separate external-validation result is recorded for this article. Publication does not establish effectiveness; check the evidence, assumptions and limits in the text.
Version
V0.1 · Revised 2026-11-14

This is a readable, citable knowledge resource, not an installed Skill. When using it with AI, retain its sources and limits and review the output.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Applies to original text unless otherwise stated; excludes third-party materials. Downloading or machine reading does not extend the existing license or separately authorize derivatives, commercial use or model training.

WISERUNION Think Tank · Tool V0.1 · November 14, 2026

Download the editable Excel comparison sheet (Chinese) ↓

Two proposals can call for the same total investment yet leave the company with quite different amounts of cash. I start by following each payment from payer to recipient. Then I check exactly what rights the investor receives, who will pay future returns, and where the money will come from.

To compare proposals on one sheet, start with the same project, funding need, and review date. In the Nine-Dimension Comparison tab, enter the project entity, review period, and proposal names. Then record your current assessment, the evidence, and the questions still open for each dimension. Evidence should point to a specific document, version, date, and clause. Where questions remain, identify what needs checking and who can confirm it.

How to fill out the nine dimensions

DimensionWhat to check
Development stage and financing roundHow far has the project progressed, and which operating problem will this round address?
Capital participants and their rolesWho invests, who holds the rights, and who operates and fulfills the obligations? What risk does each party take?
Investment rightsWhat rights does the investor obtain, against whom, and when do they arise and become exercisable?
Issuance and fundraising arrangementsWho is approached through which channels, and under what conditions is payment made?
New issuance and transfers of existing rightsWhich rights are newly created, which are transferred by an existing holder, and who receives each payment?
Product structureIs the arrangement organized as a loan, direct equity, a fund, or another vehicle? What terms apply?
Trading and risk managementHow can the rights be traded or exited, what restrictions apply, and who bears the risks?
Returns and distributionsWhere do returns come from, who pays them, and in what order and under what conditions are they realized?
Registration and delivery technologyWhich records establish the rights, and who handles registration, custody, settlement, and delivery?

Check where funds go and where returns come from

In Funds and Returns, use one row for each payment. Record who pays, who receives it, how much, and when. Then record the use of proceeds, the rights obtained, and the source of returns. If an investor both subscribes for new equity and buys existing shares, enter the two payments separately. Record operating receipts separately too, marking whether a figure is an estimate for debt service or distributions, or a verified receipt.

Take proposed amounts from the proposal, approved commitments from approval documents, and actual receipts from account statements. Contracts establish rights and performance conditions. Payment records establish whether the transfer took place.

The top of the Nine-Dimension Comparison tab automatically totals proposed company financing, proposed proceeds from existing-share sales, the company's proposed funding gap, and verified financing received for each of the three routes. For a receipt to count, set the status to Partially Received or Received and enter a positive amount, a receipt date no later than the review date, and supporting evidence. Leave the amount blank if it is unknown and enter 0 if there is definitively no payment. Record installments by tranche and allocate proposed gross amounts to the respective tranches. The workbook provides three routes and 60 payment rows. Replace the examples with data from the actual project.

The fictional equipment inspection expansion in the method article illustrates the comparison. All three alternatives are proposals. The amounts in the table are in units of RMB 10,000, before fees. Analyzing a Project through Resources, Assets, Capital, Funds, and the Two Cycles

ProposalProposed recipientsRights and source of returns
A · LoanThe lender pays 100 to the company.The lender obtains a contractual debt claim and receives interest and principal as agreed. Check repayment capacity against available company cash and the repayment schedule.
B · New equityThe new investor pays 100 to the company.The investor receives newly issued equity. Returns come from eligible distributions or proceeds from a later sale to a buyer.
C · New equity and existing-share transferThe investor pays 60 to the company and 40 to the original shareholder.The investor receives both newly issued and existing shares. The original shareholder receives the sale proceeds. The investor's future returns depend on the rights acquired and the terms for distribution or exit.
Figure 4. A loan or a new equity subscription would each bring RMB 1 million to the company. Under the combined transaction, the company would receive RMB 600,000 and the original shareholder RMB 400,000, leaving the company RMB 400,000 short before fees.
Figure 4. Recipients, rights acquired, and funding gaps across the three financing routes

View full-size figure ↗Download the Draw.io source (five pages, Chinese) ↓

In proposal C, the investor proposes to pay RMB 1 million in total, of which the company would receive RMB 600,000. Against the RMB 1 million needed for expansion, the company still faces a RMB 400,000 gap before fees. For each proposal, check the actual receipt date, costs, and permitted uses. When evidence is missing for a right, a payment destination, or a source of repayment, record the open question in the relevant dimension and preserve the version of the materials used. Understanding a Project through Four Chains: Entities, Assets, Funds, and Rights

Related reading

End of article

Editable Excel tool V0.1. The workbook is in Chinese. The three proposed structures and amounts are fictional. Figures are in units of RMB 10,000.

CONNECTED READING

Document connections

Follow the references to explore this article further.

Generated from internal links in published content.

CONNECTED READING

Document graph

Drag to move the graph and use the buttons to zoom. Select a node to read its document.

Current document · Nine-Dimension Comparison Worksheet for Capital Pathways
100%
Nine-Dimension Comparison Worksheet for Capital PathwaysCurrent document · Think TankNine-Dimension Comparison Worksheet for Capital PathwaysThe Capital Logic and Pathways of Stakeholder Capital TheoryUpdatesThe Capital Logic and Pathwaysof Stakeholder Capital TheoryFrom Verified Contributions to Fulfilled Rights: How Stakeholders Form Long-Term Capital RelationshipsThink TankFrom Verified Contributions toFulfilled Rights: How Stakehol…Analyzing a Project through Resources, Assets, Capital, Funds, and the Two CyclesThink TankAnalyzing a Project through Resources, Assets, Capital, Funds…Understanding a Project Through Four Chains: Entities, Assets, Funds and RightsThink TankUnderstanding a Project ThroughFour Chains: Entities, Assets…
Current documentReferenced byReferences

Cite this article

Author
Andrew David W.Y.
Published
2026-11-14
Compiled / revised
2026-11-14
Version
V0.1

Andrew David W.Y. (2026-11-14). Nine-Dimension Comparison Worksheet for Capital Pathways · V0.1. https://yutengfei.com/en/journal/capital-path-nine-dimension-comparison/

Permanent link ↗

Follow the same question

Stakeholder Capital Governance

From the Four-Part Value Cycle to Fulfilled Rights

Start with the Notes article on the cycle of resources, assets, capital and funds, the operating and capital cycles, and the Company Zero research framework. Then use the Think Tank model, method and two worksheets to check where money goes, who holds which rights, and how obligations are fulfilled. The research essay closes with a technical contribution case and questions to verify.

SEARCH